- Maurizio
- Verde
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
- Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)
Re: 75 3.2 Vs 156 3,2
I think this 75 is more then a 3.2 but I'm not sure.
Further more this is almost a silhouette race. Very extensive modified.
Further more this is almost a silhouette race. Very extensive modified.
- Attachments
-
- comp_DSC00285.JPG (75.1 KiB) Viewed 3786 times
Last edited by Maurizio on Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Banned.. ? Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool ==> definitely BANNED!
AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool ==> definitely BANNED!
AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
- Maurizio
- Verde
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
- Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)
Re: 75 3.2 Vs 156 3,2
too give some idea...
These picture are actually taken @spa same day as the youtube inboard.
These picture are actually taken @spa same day as the youtube inboard.
- Attachments
-
- compDSC00293.JPG (82.13 KiB) Viewed 3786 times
-
- compDSC00290.JPG (72.89 KiB) Viewed 3786 times
Banned.. ? Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool ==> definitely BANNED!
AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool ==> definitely BANNED!
AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
Re: 75 3.2 Vs 156 3,2
Nice Photos! Was this on the dutch forum? His car is not as serious as the IMSA cars. It still has the original chassis and not complete tube frame like the Van Putten, Henk Thuis, et al cars.
The owner claims it's a 3,2 and it is slower than the Ron Sanen's 156 GTA. Maybe aero issue?
The owner claims it's a 3,2 and it is slower than the Ron Sanen's 156 GTA. Maybe aero issue?
- Giuliettaevo2
- Verde
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:56 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: 75 3.2 Vs 156 3,2
I believe it is an original 3,2 GTA engine, no internal changes to the engine.
Ron Sanen is a very good driver, that doesn't help the 75 driver..
Has the original chassis? Not much of it then.. At the picture i'm looking over the gearbox and there is not even a floorpan there..
Ron Sanen is a very good driver, that doesn't help the 75 driver..
Has the original chassis? Not much of it then.. At the picture i'm looking over the gearbox and there is not even a floorpan there..
Drive it like you stole it...
- Maurizio
- Verde
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
- Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)
Re: 75 3.2 Vs 156 3,2
These are photo's I made , I was on spa that race75evo wrote:Nice Photos! Was this on the dutch forum? His car is not as serious as the IMSA cars. It still has the original chassis and not complete tube frame like the Van Putten, Henk Thuis, et al cars.
The owner claims it's a 3,2 and it is slower than the Ron Sanen's 156 GTA. Maybe aero issue?
It is not completely tube frame base, but already a very serious modified car. It was the fastest transaxle based alfa that day on spa
Complete front of this 75 is reworked, tubular and at least 15 [cm] wider. Almost the complete floor aluminum sheet.
Behind the driver there is a polycarbonate shield to close the cabin and the rest of the back is open (to cool the gear box I guess).
Banned.. ? Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool ==> definitely BANNED!
AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool ==> definitely BANNED!
AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79