The most interesting thing in that article is the mention of how much stiffer the chassis feels after having various cavities foam filled.
I also found this http://foamseal.org/auto_aftermarket.htm. Unfortunately, trying to send an email was unsuccesful (maybe their email is out of action

The big advantage of the Foamseal system is their pressurised delivery system, but the only other 2 part expanding structural foam that I could find (for a diyer) was http://www.uscomposites.com/foam.html, not a pressurised delivery system.
Now, it was stated in Barry's thread on the SZ, that the SZ used bonded panels to improve the chassis strength to allow the use of coil springs instead of torsion bars. If the filling of chassis rails can improve the strength as much as is said in the SportsCompactCar article, I'm seeing potential to strengthen the 116 chassis enough to do away with the torsion bars and adapt a coil over spring arrangement that allows a decent spring rate increase.
The added advantage is a clamed decrease in noise transfer.
Thoughts and opinions?